Hitchhiking Around the Blogs (On Fisk on Norm on Jesus)

Take one part autobiography, one part historical fiction, one part atlas, one part history of Jesus studies, one part political commentary, one part history of religion, one part “use of the old in the new testament” guide, one part “comparison of Synoptic Gospels,” one part introduction to Biblical archaeology, one part “the Jerusalem equivalent to Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas,” and one part “Who’s Who in historical Jesus scholarship” – and you have Bruce Fisk’s stimulating A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Jesus: Reading the Gospels on the Ground (Baker, 2011). It is a book with really excellent content, and masterfully produced as well.
I will admit, though, that I was a skeptic at first. When the opportunity came to review the book, I was barely interested (mostly because I could not figure out what the book was actually about). However, then I ran into the endorsements: Richard Hays, Gary Burge, Ross Wagner, Marianne Meye Thompson, Mark Allan Powell… OK…clearly Fisk is on to something and I should figure out what it is!

The basic idea is this: a fictionalized character named “Norm” (young student of religion with doubts about his Christian faith) who has the opportunity to go to the Holy Land and work out his thoughts about Jesus right there. The book chronicles, in first person, his adventures and reflections. Fisk admits that his own (many, many) journeys to Jerusalem and its surrounding areas furnish a good amount of information for “Norm’s” itinerary and experiences. In fact, one is often left wondering, did Fisk do that? Did he really run into that person?

A major question that one must ask when reading this book is: what is the purpose of the book? Put another way, at the beginning of this post I used the imagery of ingredients for a recipe. But a recipe for what? What kind of hunger does this meal satisfy?

I think it is meant to introduce students of Jesus (especially those Fisk commonly interacts with in his courses) to a person like them (with some faith and some doubt) who can help them work out their (mis)understanding of Jesus as both real human from Galilee and also his message and what it meant. You can tell that Fisk is not interested in comfortable, quick, or easy answers. The book points towards a sense of owning the complexity in such a way that faith continues to be an adventure. There is no taming Jesus in faith, there is no taming Jerusalem (today, right now), there is no end to the exploring. And…there is a lot of fun to be had on the way (some of it involving narcotics?).

I think what Fisk understands is that most “backgrounds” books are boring. Also, they don’t engage directly in the personal challenges of faith, the questions that are raised by the mystery of who Jesus is and what he was doing in his life on earth. “Norm” illuminates our thinking not simply by answers discovered, but also in the eagerness to explore every nook and cranny of the Holy Land while reading every bit of the Gospels. This is, in a sense, “narrative therapy” for real students who need to “explore” their own doubts when they engage in historical Jesus studies.

And Oh the people you will meet along the way! Fisk has Norm bump into (in all sorts of peculiar situations) a variety of scholars who frequent Jerusalem themselves (unless dead): John Meier, Jonathan Reed, Dom Crossan Scot McKnight, James Dunn, Ben Meyer…Mark Goodacre’s blog (of course) makes an appearance as well.

The brilliant thing about this book is that Fisk is the only one really qualified to write this kind of text, with extensive knowledge of the geography, history, and political climate of Jerusalem, as well as his many years teaching on Jesus. I suppose there are others who might come close to his knowledge, but few who have the creative and engaging writing skills that Fisk demonstrates.

Are there weaknesses in the book? If there would be one that I would flag up, it is this: the uniqueness of the genre and information of the book makes it challenging to use because it doesn’t get very far in any one area of study (history of scholarship, geography, politics, personal doubt, etc…). In that sense, while it would “fit” a “Jesus and the Gospels” class, it would be difficult to assign this as one more book to read alongside an “introduction” (like Stanton or Blomberg). It might work for a hermeneutics course, but you would have the same challenge. That does not disregard its worth, but it does pose challenges for using it as a textbook. So, I am not sure how or why I would use this in a class, but I really do appreciate its creativity and grit.

One last thing –  I always like a book that looks good and this is one where the publisher has invested a lot in the quality of the production, with photographs, tons of charts, and lots of sketches here and there. If you get a chance, thumb through the book at SBL or check it out online. Thanks, Bruce, for raising the bar on how Biblical scholars write engaging and illuminating textbooks for our students!

I will have another post on Thursday focusing more specifically on Fisk’s ruminations on the genre of the Gospels. That is what I found most interesting!

CHECK OUT THE BLOG TOUR OFFICIAL SITE AND ENTER THE CONTEST FOR A CHANCE TO WIN SOME REALLY GOOD BOOKS FROM BAKER!

About these ads

4 thoughts on “Hitchhiking Around the Blogs (On Fisk on Norm on Jesus)

  1. […] In his travels, Norm asks difficult questions not only about the Bible and history, but other subjec…. He meets people who have engaged in violence on behalf of their communities, and cannot help but consider some of the tensions in the outlook of those communities. One poignant moment is the seeming contradiction between a Jewish settler’s T-shirt, which says “Never Again” referring to the Holocaust, and graffiti on a nearby wall which says “Gas The Arabs” (p.248). Norm also encounters an individual involved in the illicit antiquities trade. And so the Bible is considered not only in terms of its possible relation to history and the past, but also its connection with present-day communities, and the ways in which archaeology and pseudo-archaeology can impact our understanding of the Bible as well (p.260). […]

  2. Nijay, We met as fellow presenters in the L.T.Johnson review at the most recent SBL.
    I wanted to thank you (retroactively) for this post, because it alerted me to a book I might have otherwise missed. I’m still writing my dissertation, so I don’t keep up on book releases as I’d like. But I’m also teaching full-time and need some creative “ways in” to the questions of NT studies. I assigned this book for my class (undergrad, upper-division) on Jesus and the Synoptics. My students are LOVING it and find it extremely approachable. I love how it introduces snippets of primary and secondary texts pertinent to the topical discoveries “Norm” is making.
    Anyhow, you were the “midwife” of this book-discovery, and for that, I thank you!

    • Hi Kara! Thanks for the note. Glad to know the book has been helpful for your courses. I am sure Bruce Fisk is excited too!

      I’ve never been called a midwife before, but in this case I appreciate it!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s