The Best Scholarship on 2 Corinthians

As I am working my way (chronologically) through Paul’s letters, I just completed 2 Corinthians and have begun on Romans. Thus, it is time to share my thoughts on this very rich, but also very controversial epistle. Where to begin?


There are several satisfactory introductory essays or articles to allow one to ‘dip their toes’ into 2 Corinthians. I would recommend two things: Either Scott Hafemann’s ‘Letters to the Corinthians’ in Dictionary of Paul and his Letters, or a short article by Gerald Borchert entitled ‘Introduction to 2 Corinthians’ in Review & Expositor (86.3; 1998 – available in PDF on ATLA if you use EBSCO).


Although 2 Corinthians is not as well served in terms of commentaries as the first canonical letter, there are still several very good ones.

In terms of short commentaries, I would suggest Linda Belleville’s volume in the IVPNT series. For a medium size one, Jan Lambrecht (Sacra Pagina), Scott Hafemann (NIV Application), or Ben Witherington (Socio-rhetorical). Each of these has its strengths. Lambrecht is good on dealing with a number of thorny exegetical passages and isn’t afraid to question ‘consensus’ views; also good on the letter’s theology. Hafemann’s is great especially for pastors and anyone who really wants to follow Paul’s train of thought in the letter. Witherington is great with…well, the sociology and rhetorical aspects of Paul’s writing.

Now, when it comes to the massive commentaries, I think nothing can outdo Murray Harris’ NIGTC volume. It is excellent across the board. If you had to buy one commentary, I would suggest this one. If you had money to buy two, I would say pick up Hafemann as well.

Theology of 2 Corinthians

As for the theological dynamics of this letter, several items come to mind. First, Tim Savage’s Power through Weakness – a published thesis that explores this central theme. Not too distant is Hafemann’s Suffering and Ministry in the Spirit – a piece that I have turned to time and time again for insight. And, one cannot ignore the 2nd volume of Fortress Press’s Pauline Theology that contains an important engagement between David Hay, Steven Kraftchick and Beverly Gaventa – a must read (especially Kraftchick).

Special Studies

Finally, special attention should be given to the edited volume (Bieringer) on the Corinthian Correspondence which contains a number of interesting essays:

Paul’s argument from the Old Testament and christology in 2 Cor 1-9: the salvation-history/restoration structure of Paul’s apologetic, by S Hafemann.

Dangerous boasting: Paul’s self-commendation in 2 Corinthians 10-13, by J Lambrecht.

Paul’s journey to paradise: some exegetical issues in 2 Cor 12,2-4, by M Thrall.

Paul’s use of Exodus in the Corinthian correspondence, by C Hickling.

Knowledge of Christ and knowledge of God in the Corinthian correspondence, by V Koperski.

Reconciliation and 2 Cor 5,18-21, by S Porter.

2 Cor 5,21: the interpretive key to Paul’s use of dikaiosynē theou?, by R Moore.

Final Thoughts

I found that there is still a lot of work to be done in 2 Corinthians and I hope to see more students engage in this letter. So much more attention is given to 1 Corinthians, I think because the background of the second letter is so elusive. But, let’s not give up learning! Also, though I think many have focused on 2 Corinthians 2-6 and 8-9, we could use more research on the other portions of the letter, especially chapters 1 and 10-13.


4 thoughts on “The Best Scholarship on 2 Corinthians

  1. What? No mention of Thrall’s two volume ICC work? I definitely agree that Harris is the best. I’ve not dipped into Haffemann, but I really appreciate the thoroughness of Thrall.

    This is a great idea though, listing what you think is really helpful as you’re engaged in primary research!


  2. It’s a bit older, and decidedly different, but I have found Frances Young and David Ford’s “Meaning and Truth in 2 Coriinthians” a stimulating theological engagement with the letter.

  3. The best commentary I have found is actually one written a century ago by one named Christian Kling, and then Garland’s is probably next

  4. I’m not going to lie, I’m finding Garland’s commentary less helpful than I hoped considering the reviews. I’m looking at Barrett right now, but your article here is pushing me elsewhere…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s