Larry Hurtado Asks, “Were the Gnostics ‘Intellectuals?'” (Skinner)

Gospel_of_MaryOver at his blog, Larry Hurtado discusses the assertion that the ancient gnostics were “intellectuals”–an assertion he thinks this is “very funny, really.”

Two quotes in particular stood out to me:

It’s perhaps a natural mistake for people who haven’t read the texts, given that “gnostic” comes from the Greek word “gnosis”, which means “knowledge.”  But in the case of those called “gnostics,” the kind of “knowledge” that they sought wasn’t “intellectual,” but (to put it kindly) what we might term “esoteric,” secretive truths expressed typically in cryptic, riddling form, deliberately intended to make little sense as expressed.  Put unkindly, one might characterize it as a bunch of “mumbo-jumbo” with no attempt to present them reasonably and in terms of the intellectual climate of the time.


There are modern equivalents to the ancient “gnostics,” people who go for the esoteric, who imagine themselves “special” in some way, such that, without the sort of academic training most of us think necessary, they can leap into some mystical “truths.”  Just go to the average bookshop and scan the “religion & magic”  section (yeah, I know, “religion & magic,” says it all).  You’ll likely find many (perhaps most on the shelves) catering to such tastes and positing such ideas.

If you really want to observe “intellectuals” at work in the first few Christian centuries, Hurtado suggests reading the Ante-Nicene Fathers.