Book Notice: The Synoptic Problem: Four Views (Skinner)

Synoptic ProblemEarlier in the week I checked my campus mailbox and found this treat waiting for me: The Synoptic Problem: Four Views (ed. Stanley E. Porter and Bryan R. Dyer; Baker Academic). I have always been a fan of the “four views” (or “three views”) format. I find them helpful for introducing students to a given subject and useful for helping a professor get a bird’s-eye-view of the salient points for and against a specific view.

This book features the following lineup of scholars/arguments:

Craig Evans: Two-Source Hypothesis, Mark Goodacre: Farrer Hypothesis, David Peabody: Two-Gospel Hypothesis, Rainer Riesner: Orality and Memory Hypothesis

I was happy to see focused attention given to the Farrer Hypothesis and to Riesner’s “Orality and Memory” Hypothesis. I think this coverage of the topic is particularly useful since: (1) Q skepticism has grown quite a bit in recent years—largely due to the efforts of Mark Goodacre—and needs to be given serious consideration by students of the NT; and (2) research on orality and social memory has significantly impacted our study of the gospels and the historical Jesus in recent years. This book is a welcome addition to the spate of works on the Synoptic Problem. I am planning to use this as one of the primary texts the next time I teach an undergraduate course on the gospels.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Book Notice: The Synoptic Problem: Four Views (Skinner)

  1. Is it possible that all the gospel authors were originally basing their account on one and the same protogospel that is not available to us, with each author modifying it based on their own views about Jesus and the audience they serve at different points of time of development of Christian theology? Just a random thought.

    • John, What you suggest is certainly possible. However, on the basis of Occam’s Razon, in this case, limiting the number of one’s possible sources for the synoptic gospels is generally considered a better hypothesis than one which requires more hypothetical sourees. If such limiting should prove to be unproductive, then one might follow your suggestion by mutiplying the number of sources for the NT gospels. Best, David B. Peabody, Professor of Religion Emeritus, Nebraska Wesleyan University, Lincoln, NE e-mail: dbp@nebrwesleyan.edu

  2. Sorry, I didn’t complete my thought. So in my take on this, there will be a protogospel about the ministry of Jesus beginning from his baptism at Jordan river until where tomb was found empty and a sayings gospel (like Q source) which includes all his teachings as the two original sources regarding Jesus. Is it far off from what scholars are considering at this moment?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s