Over at RBL, there is a review by Craig Koester of Character Studies in the Fourth Gospel, the volume recently edited by Steven Hunt, Francois Tolmie, and Ruben Zimmerman. Not only did I contribute several chapters to this fine volume, but the subject matter is close to my heart. See Koester’s largely sympathetic review here.
If it seems that every time you click a link on social media this past week, you are hearing about the upcoming AAR/SBL meetings in San Diego, it’s probably because many of us are giddy about the opportunity to gather with friends, buy discounted books, eat at high end restaraunts, and oh yeah, present and listen to papers. What makes this whole scenario even better (at least here in the US) is that when we return home we go right into the Thanksgiving holiday. Thus, SBL is like a pre-holiday!
This year I will be giving a paper in the Johannine Literature Group in which the topic is “Characterization in the Gospel of John.” Here’s the lineup:
4:00 PM to 6:30 PM
Room: Room 25 B (Upper level) – San Diego Convention Center (CC)
Theme: Characterization in the Gospel of John
Ruben Zimmermann, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Presiding
Christopher W. Skinner, Mount Olive University
Toward a Theory of Character for Interpreting the Gospel of John (20 min)
Cornelis Bennema, Wales Evangelical School of Theology
The Scope and Limitations of Using a Uniform Approach to Character in the Gospel of John (20 min)
Alicia D. Myers, Campbell University Divinity School
Topographies of Person: Mapping Ancient Characterization in the Gospel of John (20 min)
Break (5 min)
Steven A. Hunt, Gordon College, Francois Tolmie, University of the Free State and Ruben Zimmermann, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Character Studies in the Fourth Gospel: Methods, Trends, Results (20 min)
Francis J. Moloney, Australian Catholic University
The Final Appearance: Characters in John 20 (and 21) (20 min)
James L. Resseguie, Winebrenner Theological Seminary
Character and Point of View: The Beloved Disciple as Test Case (20 min)
Discussion (25 min)
If you’re interested in the subject, we’d love to see you there. Everyone on the panel has written something of substance on the topic in recent years. I’m really looking forward to the interaction.
I just got the official word that my paper, “Toward a Theory of Character for Interpreting the Gospel of John,” will be part of a session sponsored by the Johannine Literature group at this year’s annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature. I am excited about this for several reasons: (1) This is an area that I obviously care a lot about (see here and here), (2) I get to present alongside my friend and doctoral advisor, Frank Moloney, and (3) I have submitted proposals to this section two or three times previously and have been rejected each time. The group of presenters at this session includes a number of people who have been doing significant work in this area for some time now. Here’s the lineup:
Characterization in the Gospel of John
- Presider: Ruben Zimmerman
- Christopher Skinner, Toward a Theory of Character for Interpreting the Gospel of John (20 min)
- Cornelis Bennema, The Scope and Limitations of Using a Uniform Approach to Character in the Gospel of John (20 min)
- Alicia D. Myers, Topographies of Person: Mapping Ancient Characterization in the Gospel of John (20 min)
- Steven A. Hunt, Character Studies in the Fourth Gospel: Methods, Trends, Results (20 min)
- Francis J. Moloney, The Final Appearance: Characters in John 20 (and 21) (20 min)
- James L. Resseguie, Character and Point of View: The Beloved Disciple as Test Case (20 min)
This should be a really good session. If you are interested in narrative criticism, characterization, or the Gospel of John, you will likely find something useful there.
Today I was notified by Dan Batovici that the recent volume, Character Studies in the Fourth Gospel (ed. Steven A. Hunt, Francois Tolmie, Ruben Zimmerman) was reviewed over at Reviews of Biblical and Early Christian Studies. I have a special place in my heart for this volume. Not only was I privileged to contribute two essays to the book (character studies of “The World” and Malchus), but I was in constant contact with the editors as I brought forth my own volume, Characters and Characterization in the Gospel of John (Library of New Testament Studies), during the same period their volume was emerging. The review, written by a young scholar named Josaphat C. Tam, is interesting in that it only looks at three of the seventy essays in the book. The first of those three happens to be my study of “The World.” In the second of two paragraphs devoted to my essay, Tam writes:
While Skinner’s exegesis from the selected texts is reasonable to show that his view stands, he seems to have undervalued the significance of texts like 1:29; 3:16-17; 8:12; 9:5; 16:8; 17:21, 23, where the world clearly remains the object of God’s love and the evangelistic target of Jesus and the Paraclete (subsequently the Christian community). There is a tension between the unbelieving/rejecting attitude of the world towards Jesus and the hopeful conversion of the world for which Jesus/the author maintains. If the unbelieving characters/traits are represented by the world, the believing characters are also represented by the world. Being also members of the world, the Samaritans, the Samaritan woman, the blind beggars, and the disciples etc. encounter Jesus and are called to be children of God. They are from the world; upon understanding God’s love and through their believing understanding, they no longer belong to it while they are still in it (cf. 17:11, 14-16). The Pharisees’ fear in 12:9, “the world has run off after him,” though hyperbole it may be, ironically contains an element of truth. Far from expressing the world’s following in ignorance as Skinner claims (p.67), these words of the Pharisees can be a partial summary to Jesus’ ministry. Through these words, the author shows to the readers that, in contrast to those religious elite, truly some members of the world can be receptive to Jesus’ message. A clear example is that even the crowd (7:31, 40-43) are divided in their attitude towards Jesus. Time and again, the world is the receiver of God’s promises, though unfulfilled to some, yet definitely not to the others. In light of these observations, it seems the more complex traits of the world should be further explored.
I am, of course, thankful for the engagement and I think Tam raises some helpful questions. However, I would say in response that if Tam had read the introductory portion of my essay a little more carefully, he would have noticed where I map out a specific approach for my analysis of the world as a character. I am focusing on specific instances where the kosmos behaves as the Johannine Prologue (1:1-18) predicts. I am also clear that my focus is intentionally narrow. I wanted to examine the kosmos as a character (the aim of the volume) as opposed to a comprehensive discussion of the concept of the kosmos in the Fourth Gospel.
Overall, Tam’s impressions of the book are good…and I agree with him. If you are interested in narrative criticism, Johannine studies, character studies, and related areas, you will want to check out the book. (The price tag is pretty hefty, so for my friends in academia who want a copy, you should probably volunteer to review it for a journal!)